National Right to Life joins other pro-life organizations in asking Senate Republican leaders to extend restrictions on federal funding for abortion providers. The coalition urges use of budget reconciliation before the existing restriction expires and argues that taxpayers should not subsidize the abortion industry.
Hannah Callahan explains the role of state-level marches alongside the national March for Life. The discussion highlights young participants and public demonstrations as components of pro-life organizing.
Faye Barnhart recounts her involvement in Colorado's pro-life movement. The publisher describes the conversation as emphasizing legislative action, public advocacy, and faith-driven efforts.
Hawkins rejects the idea that one legal tactic, message or political victory will by itself end abortion. She argues for a sustained movement combining law, politics, persuasion and direct support for women and families.
Hawkins argues that opposition to abortion should be grounded in a broader commitment to the value of human life. She applies that reasoning to capital punishment and explains why she sees the death penalty as inconsistent with her pro-life worldview.
Dannenfelser’s address assesses the national political and legal landscape for abortion four years after Dobbs. She outlines priorities for pro-life advocacy, including abortion-drug policy, elections and support for women and children.
Triller Harms argues that protecting unborn children should not require rhetoric or policies that disregard women in crisis. She calls for a pro-life approach that combines legal protection with compassion, pregnancy support and attention to coercion and abuse.
Hawkins examines underlying assumptions that shape debates within the pro-life movement about law, responsibility and strategy. She urges advocates to focus on protecting unborn children while taking seriously the real circumstances surrounding women and abortion.
Hawkins argues that some abortion-abolition approaches can undermine incremental protections that save unborn lives. She defends a strategy of pursuing the strongest achievable protections while continuing to seek broader legal protection for unborn children.
Triller Harms critiques abortion-abolition proposals that emphasize criminal punishment for women who obtain abortions. Writing from a pro-life perspective, she argues that justice should account for coercion, vulnerability and the movement’s responsibility to offer mercy and practical support.
Flinn argues that overturning Roe did not substitute for persuading the public about abortion and protecting unborn life. He advocates locally grounded cultural outreach alongside incremental legal protections that voters will support.
Schadenberg organizes the coalition's 2025 reporting and advocacy into a month-by-month review. The roundup links Canadian assisted-dying controversies, disability-rights developments, and campaigns over assisted-suicide legislation in the United States and elsewhere.
Grondelski argues that public approval of adoption is not consistently matched by practical understanding or support. The republished commentary discusses misconceptions about placement and calls for stronger follow-through from pro-life communities.
Marten reflects on pregnancy-center workers joining the 2025 Ohio March for Life alongside families, clergy, and public officials. She argues that shared public witness and practical pregnancy support demonstrate that local pro-life ministry need not be isolated.
Hendershott criticizes Catholic leaders for honoring Senator Dick Durbin despite his support for abortion rights. She argues that episcopal silence undermines the Church’s pro-life teaching and highlights bishops and lay advocates who objected.
Trudden contrasts newly described pro-choice pregnancy centers with the services and mission of pro-life pregnancy-help organizations. She argues that similar services can obscure important differences and urges clearer communication about each organization's approach.
Madigan reflects on declining foot traffic during his prayer vigil outside a Michigan Planned Parenthood location. He cautions that clinic closures and quieter sidewalks can reflect a shift toward mailed abortion pills rather than fewer abortions, and urges pro-life advocates to adapt.
Conservative Ladies of America interviews OB/GYN William Lile about fetal development, abortion and pro-life strategy after Dobbs. The discussion presents a medical and advocacy case for protecting unborn children while urging the movement to remain engaged in state and national debates.
Hazzard compares recent Gallup abortion polling with the surge in abortion-rights sentiment around the Dobbs decision. She interprets the changes as evidence that the initial public backlash is receding, while revisiting her earlier prediction.
Trudden argues that growth in virtual abortion services changes the way pregnancy-help organizations must reach women. Her commentary calls for accessible, responsive support rather than assuming that fewer physical clinics mean less demand for assistance.
Maria McFadden Maffucci criticizes public comments about autism that she believes reduce human worth to productivity or independence. She urges pro-life advocates to defend the dignity of autistic people consistently and to support families rather than dehumanize those needing care.
Bateman surveys pro-life organizations’ priorities for 2025, including funding restrictions, abortion-drug regulation, and challenges to limits on public advocacy. Drawing on interviews with movement leaders, she describes litigation and grassroots efforts intended to advance those goals.
Kengor criticizes Kamala Harris's abortion advocacy during the 2024 election and reviews her conflicts with pro-life organizations. He speculates about the relationship between personal experience of motherhood and abortion attitudes, an interpretive claim rather than established evidence about Harris's motivations.
Godsey argues that American churches remain vulnerable to accepting abortion through exceptional-case arguments and election choices. He points to support for state abortion amendments among churchgoers as a challenge for Christian teaching and engagement.
Hazzard introduces the Every Life theme for the January 2025 March for Life. She encourages participation as a public expression of pro-life commitment regardless of the presidential election's outcome.