Tag
Moral arguments, respectful discussion and persuasion on life issues.
Root argues that framing abortion exclusively around adult women's rights leaves the rights of unborn girls out of the discussion. Drawing on Catholic moral reasoning and criticism of sex-selective abortion, he calls for a conception of equality that includes children before birth.
Read →Bailey writes an imagined letter from an unborn child asking whether the Declaration of Independence's promise of equality includes the youngest human beings. The essay argues that dignity and the right to life should not depend on size, independence, desirability, or future achievements.
Read →Pigue argues that churches should address abortion as a moral and pastoral concern rather than avoid it as a divisive political subject. Drawing on pregnancy-help experience, she says compassionate teaching should combine protection of unborn life with forgiveness and support for people grieving past abortions.
Read →Grondelski argues that abortion debates continue to rely on an overly individualistic understanding of privacy after Dobbs. He discusses medication provision, state policy, and the need for local support networks as areas where he believes broader public responsibilities remain relevant.
Read →Paul Stark distinguishes personal preferences, religious beliefs, and claims about justice when discussing opposition to abortion. He offers questions intended to help pro-life readers engage people who oppose abortion personally but support its legal availability.
Read →Hawkins examines underlying assumptions that shape debates within the pro-life movement about law, responsibility and strategy. She urges advocates to focus on protecting unborn children while taking seriously the real circumstances surrounding women and abortion.
Read →Flinn argues that overturning Roe did not substitute for persuading the public about abortion and protecting unborn life. He advocates locally grounded cultural outreach alongside incremental legal protections that voters will support.
Read →Bohan highlights Secular Pro-Life graphics that performed strongly or communicated key arguments during 2025. The collection functions as a snapshot of the organization’s messaging on fetal development, abortion ethics and pro-life persuasion.
Read →Campbell compares words such as baby, fetus, and preborn in conversations about abortion. She argues that useful terminology should support substantive dialogue rather than turn disagreements over labels into the entire discussion.
Read →Carlson uses the story of Horton Hears a Who to introduce a philosophical discussion about protecting very small persons. The accessible opening connects the familiar children's story with pro-life reasoning about personhood.
Read →Brahm and Monica Snyder answer listener questions about biological personhood arguments, misinformation, and abortion-related healthcare claims. They also discuss difficult dialogue dynamics and nonreligious resources for people seeking support after abortion.
Read →Paul Stark describes Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life's training of fair-booth volunteers in respectful abortion conversations. He shares participants' reports of improved interactions and presents dialogue training as part of the organization's broader cultural strategy.
Read →Stark explains how to acknowledge the real difficulties of pregnancy while presenting a pro-life argument. He urges readers to pair concern for unborn children with concrete support for women instead of framing their interests as competitors.
Read →Bacus examines philosophical arguments that tie personhood to consciousness or prior mental states. She argues that these approaches do not justify excluding unborn human beings from basic moral protection.
Read →Andrusko revisits Paul Stark's argument that the pro-life position rests on human equality and concern for both mother and child. He emphasizes practical support and compassion toward people with abortion experiences as essential parts of that position.
Read →Pride compiles survey responses about discussing abortion in LGBTQ communities. Respondents emphasize listening, protecting vulnerable people, and challenging discrimination rather than assuming a shared religious framework.
Read →Secular Pro-Life is holding its first-ever day-long dialogue training in Washington, DC on June 26, 2025, based on Monica's "Building Bridges" presentation to help pro-life advocates communicate across ideological divides. The estimated cost of the event is just under $2,000, covering travel, lodging, meals, and printed materials, with scholarships available to ensure cost is not a barrier for attendees.
Read →Snyder recounts a conversation with her daughter about pregnancy, abortion, and family support. She encourages parents to tell children explicitly that an unintended pregnancy would be met with help rather than abandonment or shame.
Read →Geiger and Carlson argue that pro-life responses to IVF policy should distinguish embryo-protection concerns from other religious or ethical objections. They recommend compassion toward people experiencing infertility and discuss alternatives whose medical claims require separate clinical review.
Read →Stark offers practical guidance for discussing abortion through listening, questions, compassion, and shared values. He argues that a respectful approach helps people consider the pro-life case more seriously than confrontation or assumptions about their motives.
Read →With Georgia Right to Life’s (GRTL) annual Georgia Stand for Life right around the corner (Jan. 24), now is a good time to brush up on your Personhood apologetics while making plans to attend the event. Source
Read →Burns responds to a Catholics for Choice campaign that invokes Mary's consent at the Annunciation to support abortion rights. She argues that Catholic understandings of Mary's freedom and motherhood instead express a willingness to welcome life and accept sacrificial responsibility.
Read →Snyder critiques clinical recommendations concerning fetal death before later abortion. She uses those recommendations to dispute claims that post-viability abortion is equivalent to delivering a living baby.
Read →YOU ARE INVITED! PRO-LIFE APOLOGETICS WORKSHOP Presented by Corpus Christi Catholic Church & Virginia Society for Human Life WHAT YOU WILL LEARN: Join us to learn the Pro-Life responses to the arguments made by those who are “pro-choice”. Learn how to have a respectful, cogent, and persuasive discussion. The rational, scientific, and spiritual […] The post PRO-LIFE APOLOGETICS WORKSHOP INVITATION appeared first on Virginia Society for Human Life .
Read →Snyder describes presenting her Building Bridges program to a Catholic parish in New Paltz as an atheist pro-life speaker. The recap emphasizes cross-belief cooperation and preparation for conversations about abortion.
Read →Dave Andrusko argues that pro-life communication should appeal to shared commitments about human equality and care for vulnerable people. He criticizes abortion advocacy and media portrayals while encouraging writers to keep presenting evidence and practical compassion.
Read →