Kristin Logan left Canada to seek cancer treatment in the United States after waiting nine months for a diagnosis and receiving a pamphlet about Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) before seeing an oncologist. Since moving to the U.S., Logan's condition has improved significantly, and she credits the outstanding medical care she has received there for her better prognosis.
James Talarico, then a Texas representative and now the Democrat nominee for U.S. Senate, voted "present, not voting" on the 2019 Texas Born-Alive Infant Protection Act, which required doctors to provide life-saving medical care to infants born alive after an abortion.
Pro-life groups and physicians argue that Texas' abortion law, which allows abortions to save the life of the mother, is not responsible for the death of Tierra Walker, who died of preeclampsia after receiving inadequate medical care. They contend that Walker's death was likely preventable with proper medical treatment and that the lawsuit blaming the law is politically motivated and overlooks failures in healthcare coordination and standards-based care.
Tierra Walker, a 37-year-old woman who died of preeclampsia in December 2024, is the subject of a lawsuit blaming Texas' abortion law for her death, but pro-life physicians argue her death resulted from inadequate medical care rather than the law itself. Pro-life leaders, including Dr.
The Supreme Court declined to intervene in a custody dispute involving a California couple and their surrogate, McKenna West, who refused to terminate a pregnancy despite a severe fetal heart defect diagnosis. The California court recognized Omar Ahmed and Nausheen Gilkar as the legal parents of the baby, who was born in Texas and underwent surgery, with the Supreme Court's decision leaving the parentage ruling intact amid ongoing medical care concerns.
A wrongful death lawsuit alleges that Texas' heartbeat law contributed to the death of Tierra Walker, a 37-year-old woman with multiple chronic health conditions, but medical experts argue that her care was mishandled independently of the abortion law. Texas' heartbeat law and subsequent Life Of The Mother Act provide exceptions for abortions in medical emergencies, and experts state that doctors are legally permitted to intervene when a pregnancy complication could lead to death, contradicting claims that the law prevented necessary medical care.
The family of Tierra Walker filed a lawsuit against Texas officials and medical professionals, alleging that the state's pro-life law prevented doctors from performing an abortion that they claim was the only stabilizing treatment for her preeclampsia and other health conditions. Medical experts and reports indicate that the standard of care for severe preeclampsia is early delivery to save the mother and baby, not an induced abortion, and Walker's death was likely due to subpar medical care rather than the abortion law itself.
Tierra Walker, a high-risk patient with severe preeclampsia and other chronic conditions, died due to untreated hypertensive cardiovascular disease and inadequate medical care, not because of Texas' abortion ban. Medical experts and the law indicate that life-saving interventions, including induction of labor, were legally permitted and that her death resulted from failures in basic obstetric care rather than restrictions imposed by the abortion statute.
Novielli analyzes figures on certified abortion-pill prescribers in relation to the broader physician workforce. She discusses reported reasons for not prescribing, including legal concerns, safety questions, and access to surgical backup.
What if abortion became something that could be done remotely? That is not just a provocative question meant to capture your attention. It is a new reality that happens all throughout the United States. While we cannot deny that technology has offered us convenience in many areas of life, the growth in medical care being conducted remotely through telehealth services has also given rise to an increase in “telehealth abortions.” Source
What if the government actually prioritized resources for mothers and families in a way that truly celebrated life? In this episode of the Prolife Team podcast, we explore the groundbreaking launch of moms.gov and the vital connection between Heartbeat International and this new national initiative. Join Jacob, Father Frank, and Jor-El Godsey, President of Heartbeat International, as they discuss the shift toward life-affirming government policies. We take a deep dive into the resources available on the new website, ranging from nutrition and medical care to financial planning for a child's fu
Life Legal is continuing its legal challenge to California’s abortion mandate, SB 245, and has taken the next critical step by moving forward with an appeal. The law elevates abortion above life-affirming medical care by mandating zero cost-sharing for abortion while leaving women who choose to continue their pregnancies paying out of pocket. What happens in this case will shape abortion policy far beyond California. The post The Fight Against California’s Abortion Agenda appeared first on .
When a woman experiences complications during pregnancy, especially life-threatening ones, she deserves the highest standard of medical care and every effort to save her life. The pro-life movement responds to these situations with compassion — not only for the child in the womb, but also for the brave mother fighting for her own life. Too […] The post Is Abortion Acceptable When the Mother’s Life Is in Danger? appeared first on Human Coalition .
Conservative Ladies of America interviews OB/GYN William Lile about fetal development, abortion and pro-life strategy after Dobbs. The discussion presents a medical and advocacy case for protecting unborn children while urging the movement to remain engaged in state and national debates.
A Pregnancy Resource Center (PRC) is a supportive, nonjudgmental organization that offers women no-cost services like counseling, medical care, and resources. Since their inception, plenty of myths have circulated about Pregnancy Resource Centers (PRCs) or life-affirming women’s health clinics. Unsurprisingly, the pro-choice movement spreads much of this discord to discredit the vital services provided by […] The post Debunking 5 PRC Myths: The Truth About Life-Affirming Clinics appeared first on Save the Storks .
Aldhizer and Bane challenge claims that abortion restrictions explain reported maternal deaths and question the consistency of mortality surveillance. They call for better data, clearer professional guidance, and higher standards of pregnancy care from a pro-life perspective.
by Nicole D. Hayes, MPA Over the last year or more, pro-life healthcare professionals have taken to various media platforms to speak truth and dismantle lies surrounding emergency medical care that will, in fact, be provided to women experiencing pregnancy complications.
