37 articles
Andrusko revisits Paul Stark's argument that the pro-life position rests on human equality and concern for both mother and child. He emphasizes practical support and compassion toward people with abortion experiences as essential parts of that position.
Read →Randall O'Bannon critiques a study of clinician relocation after Dobbs, questioning what its sample can establish about broader maternal-care availability. He argues that movement by abortion-only providers should not automatically be interpreted as a general loss of obstetric services.
Read →ADF describes its Ninth Circuit appeal on behalf of NIFLA and SCV Pregnancy Center over California enforcement against abortion-pill-reversal advertising. The release argues that the centers should be free to discuss the proposed treatment while their First Amendment lawsuit proceeds.
Read →ADF describes a Supreme Court petition seeking access to federal court for First Choice Women’s Resource Centers. The organization argues that New Jersey’s demands for donor identities and internal records threaten the pregnancy center’s speech and associational rights.
Read →Hawley argues that federal enforcement of the FACE Act has disproportionately targeted anti-abortion activists while inadequately protecting pregnancy centers and churches. This adaptation of her congressional testimony challenges that enforcement pattern and questions the statute’s constitutional basis.
Read →Hayes describes ADF’s We CARE campaign to defend pregnancy centers against legal restrictions and public criticism. The article combines a center leader’s personal history with an overview of litigation, proposed protections, and ways supporters can participate.
Read →Dave Andrusko argues that pro-life communication should appeal to shared commitments about human equality and care for vulnerable people. He criticizes abortion advocacy and media portrayals while encouraging writers to keep presenting evidence and practical compassion.
Read →