(Washington, D.C.): Today, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Davenport, siding with First Choice in a unanimous, 9-0 decision. The Court held that “First Choice has established a present injury to its First Amendment associational rights sufficient to confer Article III standing.” By ruling in favor of the pregnancy center organization, the court will allow First Choice to first […] The post Victory for Pregnancy Centers: SCOTUS Rules Against NJ AG in First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Davenport appeared first on Am
For Immediate Release: April 29, 2026 Contact: media@sbaprolife.org | View Newsroom Liberal Justices Smack Down Democrat AG’s Political Vendetta Against Life-Affirming Pregnancy Centers Washington, D.C. – In a unanimous decision, this morning the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a major victory for life and freedom of speech in First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Davenport. The case […]
National Right to Life welcomes a unanimous Supreme Court decision allowing First Choice Women's Resource Centers to challenge a New Jersey investigation in federal court. The release frames access to federal review as important protection for pregnancy centers and donors whose speech and privacy may be affected by state subpoenas.
Snyder argues that proposals to prosecute women who obtain abortions under equal-protection theories create serious practical and justice problems. She maintains a pro-life position while arguing that enforcement should focus on protecting unborn children without treating women as straightforward murder defendants.
Thomas More Society introduces its annual impact report, including accounts of FACE Act pardons and litigation involving pregnancy centers. The announcement also previews work on abortion referral requirements and clinic zoning alongside the firm’s other religious-liberty cases.
Chelsea Mynyk describes how Colorado's abortion-pill-reversal dispute affected her medical practice. Kevin Theriot discusses the litigation, while both guests connect the case with religious conviction and medical choice.
The Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation criticizes a Commonwealth Court order concerning public payment for abortion. Its statement argues that the ruling conflicts with taxpayers' conscience interests and predicts that expanded funding would increase abortions.
Godsey discusses a Justice Department review of enforcement of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act. He argues that pregnancy-help organizations facing threats and vandalism deserve the same protection afforded to abortion providers.
SBA Pro-Life America summarizes a Justice Department report concerning federal actions involving pro-life activists and organizations. The group argues that the findings demonstrate selective enforcement and threats to pro-life speech and religious liberty.
Pro-life advocates have spent years combatting the rising surge of chemical abortion drugs, which now make up over 60% of abortions in the United States. Admirable efforts have been made to expose the dangers of the pill, as well as the consequences that mail-order abortion is enabling nation... The post State Litigation Seeks to Curb Mail-Order Abortion appeared first on The Human Life Review .
For Immediate ReleaseApril 15, 2026Contact: comms@ohiolife.org Columbus, Ohio: Yesterday, Trumbull County Probate Judge David Engler filed a lawsuit to stop… The post Ohio Right to Life Supports Judge’s Challenge to Abortion Amendment appeared first on Ohio Right to Life .
By Judie Brown Judicial prudence in America’s legal system often reminds us of a schizophrenic individual. Rather than being anchored in simple truths—facts that are obvious—it is politics that often, but not always, affect the decisions that judges render. The abortion pill provides a perfect example of this enigma. The Food and Drug Administration is… Read More » Judges, Women, and Justice The post Judges, Women, and Justice appeared first on ALL .
Harned surveys legal disputes affecting state abortion restrictions, including conflicts over abortion medication provided across state lines. The analysis examines shield laws, enforcement disputes, and litigation from a pro-life legal perspective.
For Immediate Release: April 8, 2026 Contact: media@sbaprolife.org | View Newsroom Court Orders FDA to Complete Safety Review of Mifepristone, Gives Deadline for Status Update Washington, D.C. – Yesterday a federal district court found abortion drug coercion survivor Rosalie Markezich and the State of Louisiana have standing in their lawsuit against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration […]
Federal Court Affirms Louisiana’s Case on Abortion Pills—But Stops Short of Needed Action From Louisiana Right to Life Staff On April 7, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (Lafayette Division) issued a significant ruling in the State of Louisiana’s challenge to the FDA’s deregulation of the abortion drug mifepristone. While... The post Federal Court Affirms Case on Abortion Pills—But Stops Short of Needed Action appeared first on Louisiana Right to Life .
Today, the Supreme Court heard arguments in Trump v. Barbara, a case concerning whether babies born on U.S. soil automatically receive citizenship. More specifically, the case focused on whether all babies born in the U.S. receive citizenship, no matter their parentage, or whether only babies born to lawful permanent residents of the U.S. (as opposed to illegal immigrants) receive citizenship. What did the discussion ignore? The protections the ... Read More The post Supreme Court Takes Up Birthright Citizenship—And Ignores Rights of Preborn Babies appeared first on Students for Life of Americ
The Supreme Court of Slovenia has rejected an attempt to overturn the November 2025 assisted suicide referendum. Slovenia’s leftist government had legalized assisted suicide on July 18, and the State Council overrode a veto on July 24. A broad coalition, supported by religious leaders, organized to trigger a national referendum, gathering the required 40,000 signatures. On November 23, [...] The post VICTORY: Slovenia’s Supreme Court upholds pro-life referendum defeat of assisted suicide first appeared on The Bridgehead .
Andrew Nussbaum discusses interstate abortion-pill disputes, free speech, and Colorado litigation. He offers predictions about future legal conflicts rather than a settled account of how courts will decide them.
Recently, pro-abortion writer Jessica Valenti was a guest on Molly Jong-Fast’s podcast, “Fast Politics.” The topic of the podcast, which featured multiple pro-abortion guests, was “How We Protect Reproductive Rights Against MAGA.” Since the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision in June 2022, Valenti has become one of the most prominent voices in favor of legal abortion. […] The post Jessica Valenti misleads about post-Dobbs maternal and infant mortality on podcast appeared first on Lozier Institute .
For Immediate Release: March 13, 2026 Contact: media@sbaprolife.org | View Newsroom “Slap in the Face” to Pro-Life States, Voters Just Months Ahead of Midterms Washington, D.C. – Today the U.S. Department of Justice moved to dismiss lawsuits brought by Florida and Texas against the Food and Drug Administration – siding with the abortion industry on mail-order drugs […]
In 1992, the Supreme Court stated in Planned Parenthood v. Casey that women “have organized intimate relationships and made choices” relying on the right to abortion. The Court seemed to believe that abortion was necessary for women to have successful lives because of the time and financial commitment of raising a child. But the pro-life movement, already beginning to establish a national network of supportive pregnancy centers, was to provide another option for women who feel they cannot parent, with the introduction of “Safe Haven Laws.” Safe Haven Laws—also known as […] The post Saving a Li
A federal judge has extended the deadline to March 27 for Michigan officials to respond to a lawsuit two pro-life groups filed to challenge a state … The post Judge extends deadline for Michigan officials to respond to lawsuit challenging pro-abortion hiring law appeared first on CatholicVote org .
A coalition of pro-life, medical, and religious organizations has filed an amicus brief with the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, urging the … The post CatholicVote’s legal fund joins coalition opposing Delaware’s End of Life Options Act appeared first on CatholicVote org .
Can the government force a pro-life pregnancy center to hire staff who oppose its foundational beliefs? In this episode of The LifeCast , Rich Bennett speaks with Jim Sprague, CEO of the Pregnancy Resource Center in Grand Rapids, and Bryan Neihart of Alliance Defending Freedom about a lawsuit challenging a law that could require pro-life organizations to hire employees who oppose their mission and cover abortion in their health insurance plans. Together they unpack the constitutional and cultural implications if the government can compel nonprofits to undermine their own message. This conversa
On March 1, Luxembourg became the second country in the world to embed the “freedom” to kill children in the womb by abortion into its national constitution. The first, France, voted to put abortion in its constitution in 2024 after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and declared that “abortion is not a constitutional right.” [...] The post Luxembourg becomes second country to add abortion ‘freedom’ to constitution first appeared on The Bridgehead .
For Immediate Release: March 6, 2026 Contact: media@sbaprolife.org | View Newsroom DOJ Doubles Down, Wants Abortion Drug Harm Lawsuit Dropped Washington, D.C. – Late on Friday, the U.S. Department of Justice moved to dismiss Missouri v. FDA, doubling down on its claim that pro-life states and women harmed by abortion drugs lack standing and are not suffering ongoing harm from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Covid-era policy of allowing deadly abortion […]
Life Legal challenges Delaware’s assisted suicide law before the Third Circuit, asserting the government must protect life rather than facilitate death. Supported by 14 organizations, the brief emphasizes that assisted suicide threatens the dignity of human life and can lead to broader societal pressures to choose death, not life. The post Life Legal challenges assisted suicide law in federal court appeared first on .
Under California law, schools can secretly “transition” a child to the opposite gender without even telling their parents. That is, they could. On Monday, the Supreme Court ordered California to stop hiding children’s “gender transitions” from religious parents, since doing so likely violates “parents’ rights to direct the upbringing and education of their children.” “The parents… have sincere religious beliefs about sex ... Read More The post Why the Supreme Court’s Decision Against California’s ‘Secret Transition’ Is a Win for Life appeared first on Students for Life of America .
The Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision last week in the consolidated lawsuits (Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump) challenging President Trump’s imposition of tariffs around the world cannot be said to be a salient pro-life matter. The arguments over the impact of tax levies and expenditures have an impact when their direct effect is on families (e.g., […] The post Protecting the Power of the Purse – and the Hyde Amendment appeared first on Lozier Institute .
SBA Pro-Life America summarizes litigation challenging federal policies that allow abortion drugs to be prescribed and mailed across state lines. The article presents the organization’s legal and safety arguments and explains why the case matters for state abortion laws.
